Judicial review is a Federal Court process where a judge decides whether an immigration officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. It's not a re-hearing - the Court can't grant your application, but if you win it sends the decision back to IRCC for a different officer to redecide. You generally have 15 days to file, or 60 days if the decision was made outside Canada.
Judicial review is commenced by filing an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review - you must first get the Court's permission ("leave") before a full hearing. It's a two-step process: a paper-based leave stage, and - only if leave is granted - a judicial review hearing.
The Court does not substitute its own decision or grant your visa. It may set aside the decision and send it back for redetermination, or order a decision-maker to do something it unlawfully refused to do. Relief is available for a breach of procedural fairness, an error of law, or findings of fact made in a perverse or capricious way.
In plain terms, the judge asks two questions: was the decision reasonable, and was the process fair? If the answer to either is no, your matter goes back to IRCC for a fresh decision by a different officer.
You must file the Application for Leave and for Judicial Review within:
A judge may extend time for special reasons, but extensions are not guaranteed - so assume the short clock. Missing it can cost you the remedy entirely.
Typical timeline: leave is usually decided within a few months; if granted, the hearing follows some months later.
Lerom Law focuses on refused and complex Canadian immigration matters, including Federal Court judicial review and mandamus. Mrs. Lena Levtsun is a principal lawyer who assisted many clients with their compelx immigration cases. We give a candid read of whether judicial review is genuinely your best tool, and act quickly when a deadline is running.
Only a lawyer may represent you at the Federal Court. A member of a provincial law society (or you, self-represented) can appear; an immigration consultant (RCIC) cannot act for you at the Federal Court. For judicial review, that makes a lawyer essential.
Many judicial review applications are resolved before they ever reach a hearing. In a number of matters, the Minister - represented by the Department of Justice - agrees to set the refusal aside and return it to IRCC for redetermination, sometimes following settlement discussions, whether before or after the Applicant's Record is perfected.
Whether your case has a realistic path to that kind of resolution is something we assess candidly during your initial consultation - no guarantees, just an honest read.
Our clients describe their experience in their own words - see our Google reviews.
Every case is unique. Past results do not predict future outcomes.
A transparent, staged fee - you pay per stage as your matter moves forward, so you're never committing to the whole process up front:
Fees exclude government and Federal Court charges, translation, disbursements, and applicable tax.
If your matter is sent back for redetermination: the work involved depends on your circumstances and timeline - sometimes minimal, sometimes a full new documentation package. We scope and quote that stage separately, so you only pay for what your redetermination actually requires.
Exact scope is confirmed in your retainer agreement.
It may fit if: you were refused, you believe the officer ignored evidence, misread the law, or treated you unfairly, and you're still inside (or close to) the 15/60-day window.
It's usually not the answer if: the refusal was a fair call on weak evidence (reapplying with a stronger application may serve you better), or your matter has a tribunal appeal route instead (e.g., a sponsorship or removal-order appeal to the IAD).
If we don't think judicial review is in your interest, we'll tell you - and point you to the route that is.
Call us at +1-647-493-5205 or email us at info@leromlaw.com for additional information you need to begin the process.
It's a Federal Court process that reviews whether an IRCC or IRB decision was lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair [IRPA s.72; Federal Courts Act s.18.1]. It is not an appeal on the merits and not a re-hearing of your application: the judge looks at how the decision was made, not whether they would have decided differently. If the application succeeds, the decision is set aside and sent back to IRCC for a new decision by a different officer - the Court itself does not grant the visa, permit, or status.
Generally 15 days from being notified if the decision was made inside Canada, or 60 days if it was made outside Canada [IRPA s.72(2)(b)]. The Court can extend time for special reasons, but extensions aren't guaranteed, and the deadlines are otherwise strict. Because the clock starts when you're notified - and the full reasons sometimes arrive later - it's safest to get advice immediately after a refusal rather than waiting for the officer's notes.
No. The Court's role is to decide whether the decision was reasonable and fair - not to grant your application [Federal Courts Act s.18.1]. If you win, the decision is set aside and your matter is remitted to IRCC for redetermination by a different officer, who then makes a fresh decision. That's the realistic expectation: judicial review buys you a fair second chance at a proper decision, not an automatic approval - which is also why the strength of your underlying application still matters.
It depends entirely on whether there's a real legal error - ignored evidence, a misreading of the law, or an unfair process - not on how disappointing the refusal felt. Many applications resolve at the leave (permission) stage. A consult is where we read your refusal and the officer's notes and give you a candid view before you spend on filing.
For the Federal Court, you need a lawyer (a member of a provincial law society) - or you may represent yourself. An immigration consultant (RCIC) cannot appear for you at the Federal Court [Federal Court — official]. RCICs can represent clients before IRCC and the IRB, but judicial review is a court proceeding, so the line matters here. Given the short deadline and the procedural rules, most applicants are better served by counsel.
Lerom Law charges a transparent, staged fee: $2,500 for Stage 1 (the Application for Leave, plus an offer to settle), $2,500 for Stage 2 (perfecting the Applicant's Record), and $1,000 for Stage 3 (the hearing) - plus the Federal Court filing fee, disbursements, and applicable tax. Because the fee is staged, matters that resolve before a hearing often cost less than the full amount. On timing, the Federal Court generally decides leave within a few months of filing; if leave is granted, the hearing usually follows some months later. Exact timelines are set by the Court and vary from case to case.