Refused by IRCC - or Facing a Complex or Inadmissibility Case? Your Options

Federal Court judicial review, mandamus, IAD appeals, inadmissibility and H&C - for clients across Canada and abroad.

Licensed Ontario lawyer focused on complex and refused immigration cases.

The image shows a dark background with a crescent-shaped curve in the center. The curve is a gradient of gray shades, with the ends tapering off and blending into the background. The overall design is minimalist and abstract.

Contact Lawyer

Book a consultation

Your Options at a Glance

Where you are in the process decides your options - and complex cases fall into three stages.

  • Before you apply: if you already know about a complexity (a past criminal record, a medical issue, a prior misrepresentation, or a permanent resident short on residency days), the goal is to fix it up front - often with criminal rehabilitation, a TRP, or the right strategy - before any refusal.
  • In process: if IRCC has raised a concern but hasn't decided (a procedural fairness letter), you're not refused yet - you respond before a refusal.
  • After a refusal: the routes are reconsideration, reapplying, an appeal (where one exists), or judicial review at the Federal Court, where the window can be as little as 15 days . This page maps each stage so you can decide your next move.

Last Updated: June 2026. Reviewed regularly to reflect current IRCC policy and Federal Court rulings.

A refusal - or a letter warning that one may be coming, or simply knowing your case is complicated - is stressful, and the worst move is to do nothing while a deadline (or an opportunity) slips. We help applicants at every stage: those who know about a complexity before applying (a criminal record, a medical concern, a prior misrepresentation, an unmet residency obligation) and want to fix it up front; those who've received a procedural fairness letter and can still respond before any decision; and those already refused - a study permit, work permit, visitor visa, or permanent residence - weighing reconsideration, reapplying, an appeal, or the Federal Court. Below is a plain-language map of every option - who it's for and the deadlines that matter. Prefer it assessed directly? Book a consultation.

Your Options Compared

Your situation sits in one of three stages: before you apply (you already know about a complexity and want to fix it up front), in process (a concern was raised but there's no decision yet - a chance to prevent a refusal), or after a refusal (your remedies). The table groups the options by stage.

OptionWhen it fitsRough timelineWhat it can / can't do
— Before you apply (you already know about an issue) —
Criminal rehabilitation / TRP Known criminal record; want to enter or apply Rehab generally available 5+ yrs after sentence complete Clears or bridges criminal inadmissibility — proactively, before any refusal
Residency-obligation strategy A permanent resident short of 730 days in 5 years Before any exam, travel or PR-card renewal Bank days, plan, or renounce — avoid a determination you'd lose
Authorization to Return (ARC) Previously removed from Canada Filed with your next application Lets you return despite a prior removal bar
— In process: a concern was raised, no decision yet —
Procedural Fairness Letter (PFL) response Before a refusal — IRCC has raised a concern, no decision yet Letter-specified (often short) Can stop a refusal before it happens — can't undo one
— After a refusal (or a stalled file) —
Reconsideration request A clear error/oversight in the decision Discretionary; no set timeline Asks the same office to look again — rarely decisive on its own
Reapply New/stronger evidence available; no hard deadline pressure New processing time A fresh start with better evidence — doesn't fix the old decision
Judicial Review (Federal Court) The decision was unreasonable or unfair ~6–7 months Can overturn an unfair decision (sent back for a new one) — can't approve your application
Mandamus Application stuck/delayed, no decision Varies Can force IRCC to decide — can't dictate the outcome
Appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) Refused family sponsorship, a removal order, or a residency-obligation decision 30 days (sponsorship / removal) or 60 days (residency) A true tribunal re-hearing that can substitute a new decision — but only for these matters, and lost where serious criminality applies
Inadmissibility relief (TRP / rehab / H&C) Refused/barred on criminal, medical, or misrepresentation grounds Varies Can overcome a specific bar — the route depends on which bar applies

.

Which Option Applies to You?

A quick way to narrow it down (then book a consult to confirm):

Before you apply - you already know your case is complex:

  • You have a past criminal record → look at criminal rehabilitation or a TRP before you apply, not after a refusal.
  • You're a permanent resident short on residency days → see residency obligation before you travel or renew your PR card.
  • You were previously removed from Canada → you may need an Authorization to Return (ARC) before reapplying.

In process - a concern was raised but there's no decision yet:

  • You received a letter raising concerns but no decision yet → respond to the Procedural Fairness Letter. This is the pre-refusal stage - an opportunity to answer IRCC before it decides, not a remedy after a refusal.

After a refusal (or a stalled file) - your remedies:

  • You were refused and believe the officer made an error → weigh reconsideration vs. judicial review.
  • You were refused and simply have stronger evidence nowreapplying may be faster than fighting.
  • IRCC has gone silent for far longer than the published processing time (no decision at all) → a writ of mandamus can force a decision.
  • Your family-class sponsorship was refused (spouse, partner, child, parent/grandparent) → you may have a right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division - a true re-hearing, different from judicial review.
  • A permanent resident was found abroad not to meet the residency obligation → there's a residency obligation appeal to the IAD (60 days).
  • You were found inadmissible (criminal, medical, or misrepresentation) → see inadmissibility options.
  • You've received a removal/deportation order → see removal & stays.
  • You don't qualify under a program but have compelling personal circumstancesHumanitarian & Compassionate (H&C).

One important point most applicants don't realize: for most temporary-resident refusals (visitor, study, work permit) there is no formal tribunal appeal - the route is reconsideration or judicial review, not an "appeal" to the IAD. The Immigration Appeal Division handles only specific matters (certain sponsorship, removal order and residency obligation appeals).

What Does it Mean to Be "Refused by IRCC"?

A refusal is IRCC's formal decision not to approve your application - set out in a decision letter and, usually, the officer's decision notes (ODN). It isn't necessarily the end of the road: you may be able to reconsider, reapply, appeal to a tribunal, or challenge it in Federal Court. What you can't safely do is wait - most options run on a deadline that starts the day you receive the decision.

What is Judicial Review?

Judicial review is a Federal Court process that asks a judge whether an immigration officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. It isn't an appeal or a re-hearing - the Court can't approve your application; if you win, it sends the decision back to IRCC for a different officer to decide again. For most permit refusals, which have no tribunal appeal, this is the main way to challenge a refusal.

→ Read more: Judicial Review at the Federal Court

Reconsideration vs. Reapply vs. Judicial Review - How to Choose

In short: reconsideration asks the same office to look again; reapplying is a fresh start with stronger evidence; judicial review challenges the decision's legality at the Federal Court. The right call depends on what went wrong and how much time you have.

Mandamus - When IRCC Won't Decide

If your application has sat far beyond IRCC's published processing time with no decision, a writ of mandamus asks the Federal Court to order IRCC to decide. It doesn't dictate the outcome - it compels a decision. There's a procedural step most people skip first (a formal demand to IRCC), which is part of what makes a later mandamus application viable.

→ Read more: Writ of Mandamus / IRCC Delay

Inadmissibility - Criminal, Medical, Misrepresentation

Being found inadmissible means a specific legal bar is blocking your application - and most bars have a defined route around them (a temporary resident permit, criminal rehabilitation, or addressing a misrepresentation finding). Often the smartest move is to deal with a known bar before you apply, not after a refusal: for a past criminal record, criminal rehabilitation is generally available 5+ years after your sentence is complete, with a TRP to bridge earlier travel. The right route depends entirely on which bar applies - and misrepresentation carries a 5-year inadmissibility, so timing matters.

→ Read more: Inadmissibility to Canada

Appeals to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD)

A few immigration decisions carry a right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division - a tribunal that can re-decide the matter, not just review how it was decided.The IAD hears four kinds of appeals: refused family-class sponsorships, removal orders against permanent residents and protected persons, residency-obligation decisions made outside Canada, and the Minister's own appeals. The deadlines are short - generally 30 days to appeal a sponsorship refusal or a removal order, and 60 days for a residency-obligation decision. Two things catch people out: a right of appeal is lost where serious criminality is involved - a Canadian sentence of 6 months or more - and most temporary-permit refusals (visitor, study, work) have no IAD appeal at all - there the route is reconsideration or judicial review.

→ Read more: Appeals to the Immigration Appeal Division

Removal & Deportation Orders

If you've received a removal order, how you respond depends on the order type. There are three:

  • a departure order (leave within 30 days or it becomes a deportation order),
  • an exclusion order (a 1-year bar to return - 5 years if it followed misrepresentation), and
  • a deportation order (you need an Authorization to Return to Canada to come back at all).

Depending on the case you may be able to appeal to the IAD (removal-order appeals are 30 days, ask the Federal Court to stay (pause) the removal while it's challenged, or apply for a PRRA (pre-removal risk assessment) before you're removed.

→ Read more: Removal Orders & Stays

Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C) applications

An H&C application asks IRCC to use its discretion to grant status on compassionate grounds when you don't fit a standard program. It's exceptional relief - not a fallback for a weak application - and where children are involved, their best interests are often the strongest factor.

→ Read more: H&C Applications

The Deadline that Matters Most

For judicial review, an Application for Leave and Judicial Review generally must be filed within:

  • 15 days of receiving the decision if the matter arose inside Canada, and
  • 60 days if the decision was made outside Canada.

These deadlines are strict, and the Court rarely grants extensions - which is why it's worth getting advice quickly after a refusal. (Other routes have their own clocks: IAD removal-order appeals are commonly 30 days; a procedural fairness letter sets its own short response window.)

Do You Need a Lawyer - and Can a Consultant Do This?

You can respond to some refusals yourself. But only a lawyer (a member of a provincial law society) can represent you at the Federal Court - an immigration consultant (RCIC) cannot. For judicial review and mandamus specifically, that makes a lawyer essential. If you're not sure whether your situation needs a lawyer, that's exactly what a 30-minute consult ($185) is for.

Why Lerom Law

Lerom Law focuses on refused and complex Canadian immigration matters - refusals, Federal Court judicial review, mandamus, inadmissibility, and H&C. We work with applicants across Canada and abroad, explain your realistic options in plain language, and act quickly when a deadline is running. Book a consultation or call +1-647-493-5205.

By submitting this form you agree with Privacy Policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
The image is a promotional graphic with the following elements:

Text: The left side of the image features bold text stating, "3 STEPS TO GET VISA." Below this main text, in smaller text, it reads "IMMIGRATION TIPS."
Image: The right side of the image shows a black-and-white photo of a person's face, partially visible, with an expression that seems thoughtful or focused.
Design Element: There is a yellow crescent shape overlaying the background of the photo, adding a visual contrast to the black-and-white theme of the photo and text.
The overall design is modern and visually engaging, aimed at drawing attention to the process of obtaining a visa.The image depicts a simple play button icon. It features a black triangular play symbol centered within a gray circle. This gray circle is set against a dark square background, making the play button stand out prominently. The design is straightforward and universally recognizable as a media play button, often used in video players and multimedia applications.
The image is a promotional graphic with the following elements:

Text: On the left side of the image, in bold black text, it reads "7 FACTS ABOUT CANADA." Below this main text, in smaller text, it reads "EDUCATION" with an arrow pointing to the right.
Play Button: In the center of the image, there is a large white circle with a black triangular play symbol, indicating that this is a video or interactive content.
Image: The right side of the image shows a black-and-white photo of a cityscape, likely a Canadian city, with tall buildings and an urban skyline.
Design Element: An orange crescent shape overlays the photo on the right side, adding a visual contrast and dynamic element to the graphic.
The overall design is modern and engaging, intended to attract viewers' attention to educational content about Canada.The image depicts a simple play button icon. It features a black triangular play symbol centered within a gray circle. This gray circle is set against a dark square background, making the play button stand out prominently. The design is straightforward and universally recognizable as a media play button, often used in video players and multimedia applications.

FAQ

What should I do if my Canadian immigration application is refused?

First, note the exact date you received the decision - most deadlines run from that date, and for judicial review the window can be as short as 15 days. Next, read the refusal carefully; if the reasons aren't clear, the officer's decision notes (ODN) usually explain what drove the decision. Only then choose your route: reconsideration, a fresh application with stronger evidence, or judicial review. The most common mistake we see is reapplying immediately without understanding why it was refused - which often repeats the same problem. If you're unsure which path fits, a 30-minute consult can map it against your timeline.

How long do I have to challenge a refusal?

For judicial review at the Federal Court, the Application for Leave and Judicial Review generally must be filed within 15 days if the decision was made inside Canada, or 60 days if it was made outside Canada. These deadlines are strict and the Court rarely grants extensions. Other routes run on different clocks - certain removal-order appeals to the IAD are 30 days, and a procedural fairness letter sets its own short window. Because the timelines are short and unforgiving, confirm your specific deadline right away.

What's the difference between reconsideration and judicial review?

A reconsideration request asks the same IRCC office that refused you to look at the file again - usually because of a clear error or something overlooked. It's discretionary and, on its own, succeeds relatively rarely. Judicial review is different: it's a Federal Court process that asks a judge whether the officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. The Court doesn't re-decide your application or substitute its own answer; if you succeed, it sends the matter back to IRCC for a different officer to decide again. In short, reconsideration is an internal second look; judicial review is an external legal challenge to how the decision was made.

Can I appeal a visitor, study, or work permit refusal?

For most temporary-resident refusals - visitor visas, study permits, and work permits - there is generally no formal tribunal appeal, which surprises many applicants. The practical routes are a reconsideration request or a judicial review at the Federal Court. The Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) does hear certain matters - for example, some sponsorship refusals and removal-order appeals - but it is not a general appeal route for permit refusals. So if you've been refused a permit, the question usually isn't "how do I appeal" but "is reconsideration or judicial review the better tool here".

Can I appeal if my family sponsorship was refused?

Often, yes - and this is a key difference from permit refusals. A refused family-class sponsorship (spouse, partner, dependent child, or parent/grandparent) generally carries a right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), a tribunal that can re-decide the matter rather than just review it. The deadline is short: generally 30 days from the day you receive the refusal. A sponsorship appeal is different from judicial review - it's a fuller re-hearing where you can present evidence and explain your relationship. One exception: the right of appeal can be lost where the case involves serious criminality (a Canadian sentence of 6+ months) or certain other inadmissibility. Because the 30-day clock runs from receipt, confirm your route quickly.

Can the Federal Court approve my application?

No. On a judicial review, the Federal Court's role is to decide whether the officer's decision was reasonable and fair - not to grant your application. If your judicial review succeeds, the usual result is that the decision is set aside and the matter is sent back to IRCC for redetermination by a different officer, who then makes a fresh decision. That's an important expectation to set: winning judicial review means a fair second chance at a proper decision, not an automatic approval - which is one reason the strength of your underlying application still matters when deciding whether to proceed.

My application is stuck with no decision - can I force IRCC to decide?

Possibly - through a writ of mandamus. If your application has been pending well beyond IRCC's published processing time with no decision and no adequate explanation, you can ask the Federal Court to order IRCC to decide. It doesn't dictate the outcome; it compels a decision. A formal demand to IRCC usually comes first - and lays the groundwork for the application. Delay cases turn on the specifics - how long, why, and what you've already done to follow up.

I received a procedural fairness letter - what should I do?

A procedural fairness letter (PFL) means IRCC has a concern that could lead to a refusal and is giving you a chance to respond before deciding. Treat it seriously and respond fully within the time stated in the letter - it's often your best and earliest opportunity to address the issue before it becomes a refusal. A strong response answers the specific concern raised, with supporting evidence. Because what's at stake (and sometimes the allegation itself, such as misrepresentation) can be serious, many applicants get advice on the response. Missing the deadline or responding only partially can lead to a refusal that is then harder to undo.

Do I need a lawyer, or can a consultant represent me?

It depends on the route. You can respond to some refusals or letters yourself. But if your matter goes to the Federal Court - judicial review or mandamus - only a lawyer who is a member of a provincial law society can represent you there; an immigration consultant (RCIC) cannot appear at the Federal Court. That's a key distinction for refusal cases specifically. For lower-stakes steps you may be comfortable on your own; for Federal Court litigation, or where a misrepresentation finding or removal is involved, a lawyer is essential. A 30-minute consult is a low-cost way to find out which camp your situation falls into.

HELPFUL RESOURCES

RECENT BLOGS

more posts

I want to
book a consultation

Book a consultation

I want to
call an expert

Call an expert