Federal Court judicial review, mandamus, IAD appeals, inadmissibility and H&C - for clients across Canada and abroad.
Licensed Ontario lawyer focused on complex and refused immigration cases.
Where you are in the process decides your options - and complex cases fall into three stages.
Last Updated: June 2026. Reviewed regularly to reflect current IRCC policy and Federal Court rulings.
A refusal - or a letter warning that one may be coming, or simply knowing your case is complicated - is stressful, and the worst move is to do nothing while a deadline (or an opportunity) slips. We help applicants at every stage: those who know about a complexity before applying (a criminal record, a medical concern, a prior misrepresentation, an unmet residency obligation) and want to fix it up front; those who've received a procedural fairness letter and can still respond before any decision; and those already refused - a study permit, work permit, visitor visa, or permanent residence - weighing reconsideration, reapplying, an appeal, or the Federal Court. Below is a plain-language map of every option - who it's for and the deadlines that matter. Prefer it assessed directly? Book a consultation.
Your situation sits in one of three stages: before you apply (you already know about a complexity and want to fix it up front), in process (a concern was raised but there's no decision yet - a chance to prevent a refusal), or after a refusal (your remedies). The table groups the options by stage.
.
A quick way to narrow it down (then book a consult to confirm):
One important point most applicants don't realize: for most temporary-resident refusals (visitor, study, work permit) there is no formal tribunal appeal - the route is reconsideration or judicial review, not an "appeal" to the IAD. The Immigration Appeal Division handles only specific matters (certain sponsorship, removal order and residency obligation appeals).
A refusal is IRCC's formal decision not to approve your application - set out in a decision letter and, usually, the officer's decision notes (ODN). It isn't necessarily the end of the road: you may be able to reconsider, reapply, appeal to a tribunal, or challenge it in Federal Court. What you can't safely do is wait - most options run on a deadline that starts the day you receive the decision.
Judicial review is a Federal Court process that asks a judge whether an immigration officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. It isn't an appeal or a re-hearing - the Court can't approve your application; if you win, it sends the decision back to IRCC for a different officer to decide again. For most permit refusals, which have no tribunal appeal, this is the main way to challenge a refusal.
→ Read more: Judicial Review at the Federal Court
In short: reconsideration asks the same office to look again; reapplying is a fresh start with stronger evidence; judicial review challenges the decision's legality at the Federal Court. The right call depends on what went wrong and how much time you have.
If your application has sat far beyond IRCC's published processing time with no decision, a writ of mandamus asks the Federal Court to order IRCC to decide. It doesn't dictate the outcome - it compels a decision. There's a procedural step most people skip first (a formal demand to IRCC), which is part of what makes a later mandamus application viable.
→ Read more: Writ of Mandamus / IRCC Delay
Being found inadmissible means a specific legal bar is blocking your application - and most bars have a defined route around them (a temporary resident permit, criminal rehabilitation, or addressing a misrepresentation finding). Often the smartest move is to deal with a known bar before you apply, not after a refusal: for a past criminal record, criminal rehabilitation is generally available 5+ years after your sentence is complete, with a TRP to bridge earlier travel. The right route depends entirely on which bar applies - and misrepresentation carries a 5-year inadmissibility, so timing matters.
→ Read more: Inadmissibility to Canada
A few immigration decisions carry a right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division - a tribunal that can re-decide the matter, not just review how it was decided.The IAD hears four kinds of appeals: refused family-class sponsorships, removal orders against permanent residents and protected persons, residency-obligation decisions made outside Canada, and the Minister's own appeals. The deadlines are short - generally 30 days to appeal a sponsorship refusal or a removal order, and 60 days for a residency-obligation decision. Two things catch people out: a right of appeal is lost where serious criminality is involved - a Canadian sentence of 6 months or more - and most temporary-permit refusals (visitor, study, work) have no IAD appeal at all - there the route is reconsideration or judicial review.
→ Read more: Appeals to the Immigration Appeal Division
If you've received a removal order, how you respond depends on the order type. There are three:
Depending on the case you may be able to appeal to the IAD (removal-order appeals are 30 days, ask the Federal Court to stay (pause) the removal while it's challenged, or apply for a PRRA (pre-removal risk assessment) before you're removed.
→ Read more: Removal Orders & Stays
An H&C application asks IRCC to use its discretion to grant status on compassionate grounds when you don't fit a standard program. It's exceptional relief - not a fallback for a weak application - and where children are involved, their best interests are often the strongest factor.
→ Read more: H&C Applications
For judicial review, an Application for Leave and Judicial Review generally must be filed within:
These deadlines are strict, and the Court rarely grants extensions - which is why it's worth getting advice quickly after a refusal. (Other routes have their own clocks: IAD removal-order appeals are commonly 30 days; a procedural fairness letter sets its own short response window.)
You can respond to some refusals yourself. But only a lawyer (a member of a provincial law society) can represent you at the Federal Court - an immigration consultant (RCIC) cannot. For judicial review and mandamus specifically, that makes a lawyer essential. If you're not sure whether your situation needs a lawyer, that's exactly what a 30-minute consult ($185) is for.
Lerom Law focuses on refused and complex Canadian immigration matters - refusals, Federal Court judicial review, mandamus, inadmissibility, and H&C. We work with applicants across Canada and abroad, explain your realistic options in plain language, and act quickly when a deadline is running. Book a consultation or call +1-647-493-5205.
First, note the exact date you received the decision - most deadlines run from that date, and for judicial review the window can be as short as 15 days. Next, read the refusal carefully; if the reasons aren't clear, the officer's decision notes (ODN) usually explain what drove the decision. Only then choose your route: reconsideration, a fresh application with stronger evidence, or judicial review. The most common mistake we see is reapplying immediately without understanding why it was refused - which often repeats the same problem. If you're unsure which path fits, a 30-minute consult can map it against your timeline.
For judicial review at the Federal Court, the Application for Leave and Judicial Review generally must be filed within 15 days if the decision was made inside Canada, or 60 days if it was made outside Canada. These deadlines are strict and the Court rarely grants extensions. Other routes run on different clocks - certain removal-order appeals to the IAD are 30 days, and a procedural fairness letter sets its own short window. Because the timelines are short and unforgiving, confirm your specific deadline right away.
A reconsideration request asks the same IRCC office that refused you to look at the file again - usually because of a clear error or something overlooked. It's discretionary and, on its own, succeeds relatively rarely. Judicial review is different: it's a Federal Court process that asks a judge whether the officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. The Court doesn't re-decide your application or substitute its own answer; if you succeed, it sends the matter back to IRCC for a different officer to decide again. In short, reconsideration is an internal second look; judicial review is an external legal challenge to how the decision was made.
For most temporary-resident refusals - visitor visas, study permits, and work permits - there is generally no formal tribunal appeal, which surprises many applicants. The practical routes are a reconsideration request or a judicial review at the Federal Court. The Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) does hear certain matters - for example, some sponsorship refusals and removal-order appeals - but it is not a general appeal route for permit refusals. So if you've been refused a permit, the question usually isn't "how do I appeal" but "is reconsideration or judicial review the better tool here".
Often, yes - and this is a key difference from permit refusals. A refused family-class sponsorship (spouse, partner, dependent child, or parent/grandparent) generally carries a right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), a tribunal that can re-decide the matter rather than just review it. The deadline is short: generally 30 days from the day you receive the refusal. A sponsorship appeal is different from judicial review - it's a fuller re-hearing where you can present evidence and explain your relationship. One exception: the right of appeal can be lost where the case involves serious criminality (a Canadian sentence of 6+ months) or certain other inadmissibility. Because the 30-day clock runs from receipt, confirm your route quickly.
No. On a judicial review, the Federal Court's role is to decide whether the officer's decision was reasonable and fair - not to grant your application. If your judicial review succeeds, the usual result is that the decision is set aside and the matter is sent back to IRCC for redetermination by a different officer, who then makes a fresh decision. That's an important expectation to set: winning judicial review means a fair second chance at a proper decision, not an automatic approval - which is one reason the strength of your underlying application still matters when deciding whether to proceed.
Possibly - through a writ of mandamus. If your application has been pending well beyond IRCC's published processing time with no decision and no adequate explanation, you can ask the Federal Court to order IRCC to decide. It doesn't dictate the outcome; it compels a decision. A formal demand to IRCC usually comes first - and lays the groundwork for the application. Delay cases turn on the specifics - how long, why, and what you've already done to follow up.
A procedural fairness letter (PFL) means IRCC has a concern that could lead to a refusal and is giving you a chance to respond before deciding. Treat it seriously and respond fully within the time stated in the letter - it's often your best and earliest opportunity to address the issue before it becomes a refusal. A strong response answers the specific concern raised, with supporting evidence. Because what's at stake (and sometimes the allegation itself, such as misrepresentation) can be serious, many applicants get advice on the response. Missing the deadline or responding only partially can lead to a refusal that is then harder to undo.
It depends on the route. You can respond to some refusals or letters yourself. But if your matter goes to the Federal Court - judicial review or mandamus - only a lawyer who is a member of a provincial law society can represent you there; an immigration consultant (RCIC) cannot appear at the Federal Court. That's a key distinction for refusal cases specifically. For lower-stakes steps you may be comfortable on your own; for Federal Court litigation, or where a misrepresentation finding or removal is involved, a lawyer is essential. A 30-minute consult is a low-cost way to find out which camp your situation falls into.