Bill C-12 Is Now Law: Every Immigration Change Explained (2026)

Lena Levtsun Immigration Lawyer
Lena Levtsun
Updated:
12.4.2026
Published
14.4.2026
Category:
Becoming a Resident (PR)
Canadian Parliament building representing Bill C-12 immigration law changes enacted March 26 2026

On March 26, 2026, Bill C-12 — the Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act (S.C. 2026, c. 4) — received Royal Assent and became law. Most provisions came into force the same day.

There has been considerable confusion about what Bill C-12 actually does. Some coverage has reduced it to an "application prioritization" tool. That is incomplete. The bill touches asylum, document cancellation, information sharing, border enforcement, and parliamentary oversight. Some provisions are in force now. Others require regulations that have not yet been published.

Need to understand how these changes affect your specific situation? Book a consultation with our team.

What Bill C-12 Actually Is

Bill C-12 is a 12-part omnibus statute. Not every part is about immigration. This analysis covers the parts that affect immigration applicants, permanent residents, temporary residents, asylum claimants, and employers:

PartSubjectImmigration Relevance
Part 1Customs Act amendmentsBorder inspection powers expanded
Part 4Oceans Act (Coast Guard)Coast Guard moved to National Defence with intelligence mandate
Part 5Information sharingIRCC can now share personal information with provinces under written agreements
Part 6Asylum system overhaulNew bars, withdrawal rules, abandonment rules, monthly reporting
Part 7Applications and documentsCabinet can cancel, suspend, or vary groups of visas and permits
Part 8New ineligibility groundsOne-year post-entry bar and between-ports bar for asylum claims
Part 11Sex offender registryCBSA shares arrival/departure data with law enforcement
Part 12Parliamentary reviewMandatory 5-year comprehensive review

Parts covering drugs, anti-money laundering, and non-immigration criminal law are not discussed here.

The Changes That Affect You: A Plain-Language Table

The table below simplifies the key changes. For the full statutory references and effective dates, see the detailed breakdown that follows.

What ChangedPrevious RuleNew RuleWho Is AffectedIn Force?
Asylum: one-year barNo time limit on when you could make an asylum claim after entering CanadaIf you entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and wait more than one year to make your claim, you are ineligibleAsylum claimants who entered Canada more than a year before claimingYes (March 26, 2026). Applies to claims made on or after June 3, 2025.
Asylum: between-ports barMaking a claim after crossing between ports of entry did not automatically make you ineligibleIf you entered along the Canada-US land border (including waterways) at a location that is not a port of entry, a regulatory time limit applies (14 days per IRPR s. 159.4(1.1))Asylum claimants who crossed between ports of entryYes (March 26, 2026). Applies to claims made on or after June 3, 2025.
Asylum: withdrawal = immediate removalNo specific removal trigger tied to ministerial withdrawalIf the Minister determines your claim is withdrawn (based on your written notice), a removal order takes effect the same day unless you seek judicial reviewClaimants who withdraw their claimsYes
Asylum: voluntary return = abandonmentReturning to your country of persecution did not automatically abandon your claimIf you voluntarily return to the country you claimed protection from before a decision is made, the RPD must declare your claim abandonedClaimants who travel back to their country of alleged persecutionYes
Asylum: leaving Canada suspends your caseNo automatic suspension for leaving CanadaIf you leave Canada during your RPD or RAD case (and have not voluntarily returned to the country of persecution), the tribunal must suspend considerationClaimants who travel outside Canada during their caseYes
Asylum: Designated Country of Origin repealedMinister could designate "safe" countries, which shortened timelines and restricted appealsDCO regime repealed entirely. Country of origin no longer affects timelines or appeal rights.All asylum claimants (positive change)Yes
Asylum: PRRA bar after withdrawal12-month PRRA bar existed for RPD rejections but not ministerial withdrawals12-month bar now applies to ministerial withdrawal determinations as wellClaimants whose claims are withdrawnYes
Asylum: monthly removal reportsNo public reporting requirement on removalsMinister must publish monthly reports: number of removal orders enforced, reasons for delays, breakdowns by country of origin, age, gender, and criminal backgroundGeneral public, counsel, advocacy groupsYes
Document cancellation: groupsNo Cabinet authority to cancel or suspend groups of immigration documentsCabinet can order cancellation, suspension, or variation of groups of visas, PR cards, eTAs, TRPs, work permits, and study permits on five grounds: administrative errors, fraud, public health, public safety, or national securityAll visa and permit holdersYes (framework). Orders affecting people inside Canada require both IRCC and Public Safety Ministers.
Application termination: groupsNo Cabinet authority to refuse or terminate groups of applicationsCabinet can order that specified types of applications not be accepted, be suspended, or be terminated, on the same five groundsAll immigration applicantsYes (framework)
Application termination: individualNo express officer power to terminate processing of an individual applicationOfficers may terminate processing of an individual application in prescribed circumstances (awaiting regulations)All applicants (once regulations are made)Framework in force; awaiting regulations
Document cancellation: individualCase-by-case cancellation under existing IRPA/IRPR groundsOfficers may cancel, suspend, or vary a visa or other document in prescribed circumstances. Cannot grant PR status.Visa and permit holders (once regulations are made)Framework in force; awaiting regulations
Overseas compliance checksNo statutory obligation for document holders outside Canada to undergo re-examinationForeign nationals outside Canada holding PR visas, TRVs, eTAs, TRPs, or other documents must, in prescribed circumstances, answer questions truthfully, produce evidence, and attend examinations including medical examsAnyone holding a Canadian immigration document while outside Canada (once regulations are made)Framework in force; awaiting regulations
Information sharing: IRCC to provincesNo express statutory framework for IRCC to share personal information with provincesIRCC can share identity, status in Canada, and document information with federal and provincial partners under written agreements. Provinces cannot share onward to foreign governments without Ministerial consent.All applicants and status holdersYes
Information sharing: IRPA dataNo express regulation-making power for cooperation-based disclosure of IRPA dataNew regulation-making power for IRPA-collected information to flow to federal departments under written agreementsAll applicants and status holders (once regulations are made)Framework in force; awaiting regulations
Border inspection: expanded facilitiesTerminal/port owners had to provide CBSA facilities for customs purposesObligation expanded to all CBSA-administered legislation (including IRPA) and expressly includes outbound terminalsTravellers at international terminalsYes
Coast Guard: intelligence mandateCoast Guard under Fisheries with no security/intelligence roleCoast Guard now under National Defence with authority to collect, analyze, and disclose intelligence. Can share with CBSA, IRCC, and RCMP.Maritime arrivals, irregular marine migrationYes (March 27, 2026)
Admissibility hearings: must be in CanadaNo statutory bar on holding an admissibility hearing while the subject was outside CanadaImmigration Division must not hold an admissibility hearing if the person is not physically present in CanadaPRs abroad facing s. 44 reportsYes
IRB decision formatChairperson had no express statutory authority over how decisions and reasons are renderedChairperson can now specify the manner in which decisions and reasons must be givenAll IRB applicantsYes
Parliamentary reviewNo scheduled comprehensive reviewMandatory comprehensive review by a parliamentary committee starting in 2031, with a report within 12 monthsEveryone — a concrete opportunity for advocacyYes

Detailed Breakdown by Applicant Type

If You Have a Pending Asylum Claim

Bill C-12's most significant changes are to the asylum system. Here is what you need to know:

The one-year bar (new s. 101(1)(b.1)): If you entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and made your claim more than one year after your entry, your claim is now ineligible for referral to the RPD. If you entered Canada more than once, the clock starts from the day after your first entry. This applies retroactively to claims made on or after June 3, 2025 (per the IRCC backgrounder).

You still have access to PRRA. The IRCC backgrounder confirms that claimants found ineligible under the new grounds can still apply for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment under IRPA s. 112. PRRA is not a full hearing, but it does assess risk of persecution, torture, and cruel treatment.

Do not leave Canada during your case. Under new s. 104.1, if you leave Canada while your RPD or RAD case is active, the tribunal must suspend consideration. If you voluntarily return to the country you claimed protection from, the RPD must declare your claim abandoned. This is mandatory — the tribunal has no discretion.

Withdrawal is now an immediate removal trigger. If the Minister determines your claim has been withdrawn (based on your written notice of withdrawal), a removal order takes effect the same day unless you file for judicial review. A 12-month PRRA bar also applies.

The DCO regime is gone. The Designated Country of Origin system has been repealed. Your country of origin no longer affects your appeal rights or processing timelines. This is a positive change for claimants from formerly designated countries.

Monthly reporting starts. The Minister must now publish monthly reports on removal orders — including how many were enforced, how many were not, reasons for delays, and demographic breakdowns. These reports are tabled in Parliament.

Parts of the asylum overhaul are not yet in force. Several provisions in Part 6 — including the new front-loaded intake process (s. 100), the pre-referral abandonment mechanism (s. 102.1), and the ministerial pre-referral withdrawal power (s. 102.2) — come into force on a date to be set by Cabinet order. When these take effect, the RPD will only receive files that are fully documented and "schedule-ready." If you fail to provide required documents or appear for examination, your claim can be transmitted to the RPD for an abandonment determination before it is even referred.

What to do:

  1. If you have an active claim, do not travel outside Canada
  2. Ensure your file is complete — missing documents will have more serious consequences once the front-loaded intake provisions come into force
  3. If you entered Canada more than a year ago and have not yet claimed, seek legal advice immediately
  4. If you are considering withdrawing your claim, understand that this now triggers a removal order

Book a consultation if you have questions about how these changes affect your asylum claim.

If You Hold a Work Permit, Study Permit, TRV, or eTA

Cabinet can now cancel or suspend groups of documents. Under new ss. 87.301-87.305, the Governor in Council can order that groups of visas, permits, eTAs, TRPs, or PR cards be cancelled, suspended, or varied. This power is limited to five grounds: administrative errors, fraud, public health, public safety, or national security.

Important safeguards:

  • Orders affecting people inside Canada require the recommendation of the IRCC Minister with the concurrence of the Minister of Public Safety
  • Every order must be tabled in Parliament within 7 sitting days, with reasons, the number of documents affected, and a description of affected persons
  • The Minister must appear before a parliamentary committee to explain the order if requested
  • The variation power cannot grant PR status or grant/extend work or study permits
  • Orders must be published in the Canada Gazette within 23 days
  • The IRCC backgrounder confirms asylum claims are outside this Part

Individual cancellation power (new s. 20.01): Officers can also cancel, suspend, or vary individual visas and documents in "prescribed circumstances" — but those circumstances have not yet been defined in regulations. This power cannot be used to grant PR status.

Overseas re-examination (new ss. 32.1-32.2): If you hold a Canadian immigration document while outside Canada, you may be required to answer questions, produce documents, and attend examinations (including medical exams) to confirm you remain admissible or eligible. The specific circumstances triggering this obligation will be set by regulation.

What this means practically:

  • Your individual permit or visa is not at immediate risk unless it was obtained through fraud or there is a public safety/health/national security concern
  • If Cabinet does issue a group order, it will be public — published in the Gazette and tabled in Parliament
  • If you are outside Canada, be prepared for the possibility of compliance checks once regulations are made

If You Are a Permanent Resident

Admissibility hearings require physical presence. Under new s. 44.1, the Immigration Division cannot hold an admissibility hearing if you are not physically present in Canada. If you are a PR facing a residency obligation report under s. 44 and you are outside Canada, you must return to Canada before the hearing can proceed.

Group document orders can affect PR cards and PR visas. The Cabinet cancellation/variation power under s. 87.302 explicitly lists PR cards and PR visas among the documents that can be affected. The same five grounds and parliamentary safeguards apply.

If You Are an Employer Sponsoring Workers

No direct changes to LMIA requirements. Bill C-12 does not amend the LMIA process, employer-specific work permit rules, or the Global Talent Stream.

Indirect effects to be aware of:

  • If Cabinet exercises the power to suspend or terminate groups of work permit applications (on the five enumerated grounds), your sponsored workers could be affected
  • The new information-sharing framework means IRCC can now share status and document information with other federal and provincial bodies under written agreements — this could affect compliance verification

Information Sharing: What IRCC Can Now Share

This is a structural change that affects everyone in the immigration system.

Within IRCC (new s. 5.4): The Minister can now share personal information within the department for any purpose related to exercising their powers and duties.

With federal and provincial partners (new s. 5.5): Under written agreements that specify the purpose, limits on secondary use, and transfer restrictions, the Minister can share:

  • Identity information
  • Status in Canada
  • Contents or status of any document issued by the Minister (issuance, renewal, validity, cancellation, revocation, suspension, etc.)

Provincial safeguard: Provincial recipients cannot share this information with foreign entities without the Minister's written consent and compliance with the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act.

Privacy safeguard: The IRCC backgrounder confirms that a Privacy Impact Assessment must be completed for any new use of personal information within IRCC.

What this means: Expect faster cross-department and cross-province detection of inconsistencies in applications. If your status, identity, or document information in one system does not match another, it is more likely to be flagged.

What Is NOT Yet in Force

Several provisions have been enacted but will only come into force when Cabinet sets a date by order. These are primarily the front-loaded asylum intake provisions:

ProvisionWhat It DoesStatus
New s. 6.1 — Designated representativesMinister must designate a representative for minors and persons unable to appreciate proceedingsAwaiting GIC order
New s. 100 — Restructured intakeMinister holds a post-officer ineligibility power; claimants must provide specified documents before referral to RPDAwaiting GIC order
New s. 100.1 — Conditional RPD referralRPD cannot consider a claim until the Minister has received and considered required documentsAwaiting GIC order
New s. 102.1 — Pre-referral abandonmentIf a claimant fails to provide documents or appear for examination before referral, the RPD determines abandonmentAwaiting GIC order (cannot come into force before s. 100(4))
New s. 102.2 — Pre-referral withdrawalMinister can determine a claim withdrawn before RPD referral if the claimant provides written noticeAwaiting GIC order

When these provisions come into force, the asylum intake process will change fundamentally — only fully documented, "schedule-ready" files will reach the RPD.

The Five-Year Review

Section 138 requires a comprehensive parliamentary review of the entire Act starting in 2031. A designated Senate, House, or joint committee must submit a report within 12 months recommending changes.

Separately, section 75.1 requires a specific review of the one-year asylum bar (s. 101(1)(b.1)) at the start of the fifth year. That report must include:

  • Average days between entry and claim, broken down by document type
  • Number of claimants found ineligible under the one-year bar
  • Proportion who exited and re-entered after their first entry date
  • Number who applied for PRRA, and how many were allowed or denied
  • Recommendations

These reviews are concrete opportunities for counsel, advocacy groups, and stakeholders to provide input.

Common Misconceptions

"Bill C-12 is just about application prioritization." No. Application categorization is one part (Part 7). The bill also overhauls asylum eligibility (Parts 6 and 8), creates a statutory information-sharing framework (Part 5), expands border inspection authority (Part 1), and gives the Coast Guard an intelligence mandate (Part 4).

"My eligibility hasn't changed." For Express Entry, PNP, study permits, and most work permit applicants, this is true — the eligibility criteria for these programs are unchanged. But for asylum claimants, new ineligibility grounds have been added. And for all document holders, Cabinet now has power to cancel, suspend, or vary groups of documents on specific grounds.

"I should wait to see what happens before applying." For most non-asylum applicants, applying sooner is still better. The group cancellation powers are limited to five specific grounds (fraud, administrative errors, public health, public safety, national security) and require parliamentary reporting. Routine applications are not the target.

"This only affects asylum seekers." The asylum changes are the most dramatic, but the document cancellation powers, information-sharing framework, and overseas compliance checks affect all immigration streams.

What You Should Do Now

  • If you have an active asylum claim: Do not travel outside Canada. Ensure your file is complete. If you entered more than a year ago and have not claimed, seek legal advice immediately.
  • If you hold a work permit, study permit, TRV, or eTA: Your document is not at immediate risk. Monitor the Canada Gazette for any group orders. Ensure your application was accurate and complete.
  • If you are a permanent resident abroad: Be aware that admissibility hearings now require physical presence in Canada. If you have a residency obligation concern, plan accordingly.
  • If you are planning to apply: For most programs, eligibility criteria are unchanged. Apply when you are ready with a complete, accurate application.
  • For everyone: The information-sharing provisions mean consistency across your immigration history matters more than ever. Ensure all your documents and applications tell the same story.

Have questions about how Bill C-12 affects your specific situation? Contact us at help@leromlaw.com or call +1-416-915-0808. You can also book a consultation to discuss your case.

FAQ

What is Bill C-12 and when did it become law?
Bill C-12 is the *Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act* (S.C. 2026, c. 4). It received Royal Assent on March 26, 2026. Most provisions came into force the same day. Some asylum intake provisions will come into force on a date to be set by Cabinet.
Does Bill C-12 change eligibility for Express Entry or Provincial Nominee Programs?
No. The criteria for Express Entry, PNPs, and the Comprehensive Ranking System are unchanged. Bill C-12 does not modify points calculations, draw mechanisms, or program-specific eligibility requirements for economic immigration.
What are the new asylum ineligibility grounds?
Two new grounds were added to IRPA s. 101(1). First, if you entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and waited more than one year to make your claim, you are ineligible (s. 101(1)(b.1)). Second, if you entered along the Canada-US land border at a location that is not a port of entry, a regulatory time limit applies (s. 101(1)(b.2), referencing IRPR s. 159.4(1.1)). Claimants found ineligible under these grounds can still apply for PRRA under IRPA s. 112.
Can the government cancel my work permit or study permit under Bill C-12?
Cabinet now has the authority to order cancellation, suspension, or variation of groups of immigration documents, but only on five specific grounds: administrative errors, fraud, public health, public safety, or national security. Orders affecting people inside Canada require both the IRCC Minister and the Public Safety Minister. Every order must be tabled in Parliament with reasons.
Does Bill C-12 affect the Safe Third Country Agreement?
No. The IRCC backgrounder confirms that the Safe Third Country Agreement is unchanged.
What information can IRCC now share with provinces?
Under written agreements, IRCC can share identity information, status in Canada, and document status (issuance, renewal, validity, cancellation, etc.) with federal and provincial partners. Provinces cannot share this information with foreign governments without the Minister's written consent.
When will the remaining asylum provisions come into force?
The restructured intake process (new s. 100), conditional RPD referral (s. 100.1), pre-referral abandonment (s. 102.1), and pre-referral withdrawal (s. 102.2) will come into force on a date set by Cabinet order. No date has been announced.
Is there a review built into the law?
Yes. A comprehensive parliamentary review of the entire Act must begin in 2031, with a committee report within 12 months. A separate review of the one-year asylum bar must include detailed statistics on ineligible claimants and PRRA outcomes.
By submitting this form you agree with and Privacy Policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

THEY SAY ABOUT US

I am immensely grateful to Ms. Lena for her exceptional assistance in securing my Canadian work permit. Her professionalism, prompt communication, and thorough guidance made the entire process seamless. She ensured I had ample time to gather and submit all necessary documents, and her swift responses to my queries provided immense reassurance. Thanks to her dedicated support, I am now embarking on a new chapter in Canada. I highly recommend Ms. Lena to anyone seeking expert immigration legal services and I will definitely choose her for future legal services . Lena’s knowledge is truly exceptional. So happy and thank you so much, Ms Lena!
Read More
Lalitha M
India
BIG thank you to Ms. Lena for your incredible support in helping my family obtain our permanent resident cards! Your professionalism, dedication, and expertise made this process so much smoother. We truly appreciate everything you've done for us!" Once again, thank you for making such a life-changing difference in our journey! Heartfelt THANK YOU.
Read More
Camille Lalloo
Trinidad and Tobago
Lena Levtsun is an outstanding immigration lawyer. She is highly professional, knowledgeable, and efficient, providing clear and personalized guidance every step of the way. Lena's responsiveness and commitment to achieving the best results truly set her apart. I highly recommend her services!
Read More
Andrea Pineda
Colombia
I want to Thank Lena for being very careful and attentive with all documents during the process. Lena makes her job perfect. I got my work permit and visa. Thank you.
Read More
Evgeniy Entaltsev
Kazakhstan
It's a wonderful place to start your application; you will get full assistance from the beginning to the last point of your application,Lerom law is a immigration firm which you can ask any questions and seek assistance to the fullest, I do recommend to anyone who needs help.
Read More
Abdull Aziz Omar
Zimbabwe
I had an SUPERB experience with Lerom Law. Lena's unwavering availability and clear guidance, linked with her deep understanding of immigration nuances, instilled a high level of confidence in the smooth process of my case application. I cannot express enough how much I recommend Lena Levtsun to anyone seeking knowledgeable and compassionate legal assistance with immigration matters. Trust me, you won't be disappointed. Thank you for the smooth and worry-free process, Lena!
Read More
Lev Trytyacehnko
Canada
"Lena Levtsun is a tremendous human being first and foremost, and an OUTSTANDING attorney. She is very professional and experienced in Canadian immigration law. Her in-depth knowledge and experience, combined with her approachable personality, have made my case great SUCCESS. Throughout my very stressful process involving a work permit, LMIA, and permanent residence applications, Lena made me feel comfortable, confident, and less stressed because she was on my side. I would recommend her to anyone."
Read More
Vivek Vi
USA
"Its exceptionally great experience with Lerom Law. Lena was very well organised, experienced, transparent, and kept me up to date on the whole process and I am thoroughly impressed. She was always prompt in responding to my emails and follow up was incredibly great. Her excellent command on immigration laws helped me to put the paper work so appropriately which finally resulted in positive decisions on files of visa and work permits. She was such knowledgeable that I felt supported and empowered throughout the entire process. I will definitely opt her for future legal services and highly recommend others to have trust in her law firm and especially Lena's talent."
Read More
Roman B.
Italy
"I had the most incredible experience with Lerom Law, and I can't praise them enough for their exceptional service. From the moment I walked in, Lena provided unparalleled one-on-one guidance throughout the entire process. Her dedication and expertise were evident from day one, and she went above and beyond to ensure my permit application was a seamless and stress-free experience. What truly set Lena apart was her genuine commitment to client satisfaction. Not only did she navigate the complexities of the legal process effortlessly, but she also took the time to teach me valuable skills, such as how to scan documents using my phone. Lena's attention to detail and willingness to go the extra mile made a significant difference in my overall experience. Additionally, Lena's generosity was evident when she made free copies of my passport documents for me, showcasing a level of care and consideration that is truly rare to find. Lerom Law and Lena's personalized approach made a potentially daunting process feel like a breeze. I am incredibly grateful for their outstanding service and highly recommend them to anyone in need of legal assistance. Lerom Law exceeded all expectations, providing not only excellent Immigration legal support but also a genuinely wonderful and supportive experience."
Read More
Emmanuel Barhai
Lagos
"Lena Levtsun is the best lawyer in regards to the immigration process, she did manage to get my work permit in the least possible time available. I would highly recommend her for all Legal matters and I am looking forward to working with her Law Firm in future Legal matters. Regards."
Read More
Hassan Gurure
Zimbabwe
"Lena is the best attorney I have ever met in Canada and the US! I have an extremely challenging case for my parents' tourist visas to Canada, as they were previously rejected for a US tourist visa. Most people believed there was only a 10% chance of winning, but Lena never gave up. She tirelessly fought for my family day and night, and we won! I can't believe my parents' visas got approved! Her professional knowledge cannot be adequately described as just "professional." She is at the top of her field, the best of the best! Additionally, she is a beautiful and kind lady who is also very diligent and responsible when handling her clients' tasks. I will continue to hire her for my PR case. Choosing Lena was the smartest and wisest decision of my life!"
Read More
Meina Li
China
"My family and I are so happy to have worked with the incredible Lena. She worked so hard to get us the Restoration of Work Permit. Lena isn’t only the best attorney we ever met but she is an incredible person too. I would definitely recommend her to anybody. Very professional and ready to answer any questions. Thanks, Lena and the team."
Read More
Holta Cerkozi
Albania
"We applied for an ICT visa from China to Canada with the intention of obtaining approval for me to work in my Canadian affiliate, along with my family, to move to Toronto, Canada. Due to the complexity of my company's structure and the recent establishment of the Canadian branch, we were worried the plan for me to relocate from China to Canada might not be approved. Before proceeding, we conducted research and communicated with seven different companies and lawyers. Ultimately, we chose Lerom Law, and it was Lena who handled our case. From the very first contact, Lena impressed us with her professionalism and in-depth knowledge of various Canadian policies, especially in regard to the company relocation aspect that I was concerned about, as well as the subsequent Permanent Residency (PR) conversion process and other areas where we struggled to find reliable information elsewhere. Lena's insights were spot-on and highly professional, which made us choose her without hesitation. Throughout the entire project coordination, working with Lena was highly efficient and organized. She provided excellent guidance in terms of document preparation, organization, and review, as well as prioritizing tasks and responding to our questions and concerns. Everything progressed smoothly. The Canadian IRCC has strict requirements for the application materials, and it demands a significant amount of time and effort from applicants. However, we feel fortunate to have had Lena's assistance as she saved us from many potential pitfalls and ultimately helped us secure the ICT visa. I am writing this review to express my gratitude and commend Lena's exceptional services. I sincerely recommend Lerom Law and Lena to anyone in need of similar visa services."
Read More
Guangyu Li
China
"Lena Levtsun's work is outstanding. She helped us throughout the entire process of applying for a spousal sponsorship visa. On top of being very responsive, she is very efficient and easy to work with, and she provided attentive support during the application. We developed a trusting relationship. The work done by Lena and the rest of the legal team was highly detailed oriented and thorough, which guided us to success. We are very thankful we could work with a lawyer with experience and expertise in Canadian immigration. We had such a great experience with Lena; we totally recommend her to anyone trying to immigrate to Canada."
Read More
Alexia Stutz
Switzerland
"We started our immigration process by initially reviewing with various immigration consultants and finally chose to work with Lena Levtsun from Lerom Law which is nothing less than a blessing in disguise. Honestly Lena has a very detailed understanding and applies the right thought process with guidance in each and every step of your immigration journey, and this helped us to realize our dream come true thank Lena from the bottom of our hearts."
Read More
Zakir Ullah
United Arab Emirates
"We wanted to establish our branch in Canada for expansion, and we didn't have a clue on whom to approach for Immigration and legal services. When we researched the web and had a consultation with a few law firms, We found Lena very knowledgeable, so we decided to go with her. During the course of the application, we had so many questions, and our case was not straightforward, Lena was very approachable, responsive and patient. Finally, we got our Work permit approved. I would definitely say she is one of the best attorneys I have ever worked with. Thank You"
Read More
Koushik Yachendra
India
"I am writing today to express my profound appreciation for all the professional support and guidance we have been provided with by Lena Levtsun (Senior Immigration Lawyer of Lerom Law Firm) throughout, from establishing a new subsidiary company in Canada to lodging a successful application of ICT Work Permit of one of our employees. It is the result of her legal expertise, analytical skills and knowledge that we have received the positive decision of the application in a short period of time. Once again, thank you for representing us in a professional manner helped us to achieve the desired outcome of our application. We wish to maintain a healthy business relationship with Lerom Law Firm and wish them to deal with all of our future Immigration needs. Thank you and all the best!"
Read More
Mandeep Singh
India
"I had reached out to Lena to prepare documents for my immigration applications. She is an outstanding lawyer and I would highly recommend her for the quality and thoroughness of her work. Keep it up!"
Read More
Navita Singh
Canada
"Lerom Law (Lena) firm is the best place for the Canadian Immigration process. She has given tremendous support throughout the process of the Ontario PNP program and Express Entry program. She studies our file and provides the customized advice needed to win the process, such as how we can improve the points in Express Entry or ace the filing with easily traceable substantiation. Will recommend her for any of your immigration process to Canada."
Read More
Kalaivathaney Janakan
Sri Lanka
"Lena and the team at Lerom Law were absolutely fantastic at helping me obtain my work permit. I would definitely recommend them to anybody. Extremely professional and always there to answer any questions."
Read More
McKenna Broadbent
United Kingdom
"Where does one begin, to describe the Professionalism of Lerom Law and Lena Levtsun? As a family beginning the process of coming to Canada, it was a terribly daunting task, and our situation was by no means a "slam dunk" Lena was able to navigate all the complications and put together a comprehensive submission letter and application. Leaving no t or i undotted or uncrossed. Just incredible. Thank you, Lena, and thank you, Lerom Law. We are overwhelmed with joy at the success of our application."
Read More
Greg Schultz
South Africa
"Great Experience best and honest service provided by Lena. She is the best lawyer in Toronto!"
Read More
Abdul Khan
Canada
"Excellent service and very supportive!!! I would have an amazing experience with Lerom Law firm. I highly recommend their services. I was super happy with their service."
Read More
Nurislom Eshnazarov
Uzbekistan
"Lerom Law is professional 100%"
Read More
Evelyn Chituwu
Jamaica
"Very helpful and excellent service. Always there for every step of my visa process."
Read More
Pradeepraj Muthukrishnan
Canada
"Best Immigration Law firm. Fully Professional"
Read More
Mr Bansal
India

HELPFUL RESOURCES

more resources
The image shows a calculator set against a light blue background. The calculator is also in a light blue or teal hue, maintaining a monochromatic theme. The calculator has a standard layout with a numeric keypad, function buttons, and a display screen at the top. The display shows the number "0," indicating that it is turned on and ready for use.
Points calculator
The image shows a document or a table set against a light yellow background. The document itself also appears to be in a yellow hue, blending somewhat with the background. The table seems to be organized into rows and columns, with headers at the top and data filling the cells below. Due to the resolution and color scheme, the specific contents of the table are not legible, but it is clear that it is structured and contains textual or numerical information.
Eligibility assessment form
The image shows a minimalist illustration of a laptop. The laptop is colored in pink and is set against a pink background, giving the entire image a monochromatic look. The laptop is open, with the screen facing the viewer, and is depicted with simple lines and no additional details. The overall design is clean and modern, with a playful and stylish color scheme.
Immigration webinars